Connect with us

Politics

The Hitchhiker’s Guide To What Tonight’s Win By Cortez Masto Means for the Senate

Source image: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hitchhikers-guide-what-tonights-win-cortez-masto-means-the-senate

The win by Sen Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) over GOP challenger Adam Laxalt means Democrats have a 50-50 Senate at minimum, thanks to the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Harris. 

This is critically important. That’s because Senate Democrats can still confirm President Biden’s nominees – particularly to the federal judiciary 

Republicans would have put the kibosh on many nominees. 

However, the big one here is the potential for a Democratic Senate to confirm someone to the Supreme Court should there be a vacancy. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) would be under pressure to reprise his decision from 2016 of not holding a hearing for a Biden SCOTUS nominee were he Majority Leader. 

DEMOCRATS TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE

The win by Sen Catherine Cortez Masto (D-AZ) over GOP challenger Adam Laxalt means Democrats have a 50-50 Senate at minimum, thanks to the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Harris. 

The win by Sen Catherine Cortez Masto (D-AZ) over GOP challenger Adam Laxalt means Democrats have a 50-50 Senate at minimum, thanks to the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Harris. 
(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The Cortez Masto win slightly diminishes the Senate runoff in Georgia between Sen. Raphael Warnock and GOP challenger Herschel Walker. 

However, Democrats would rather have a 51-49 Senate advantage than 50-50. 

51 votes means there would be no power-sharing arrangement with Republicans which exists now. Democrats would have ratio advantages on committees. This would diminish the need for “discharge petitions” to dislodge otherwise stuck nominees which are bottles up in committee because of tie votes. 

51 votes would also give Democrats a cushion if there are absences, especially due to COVID. 

But Democrats are now going to face TREMENDOUS pressure from the left now to eliminate the 60-vote threshold to end a filibuster on legislation. In fact, Democrats may have already picked up at least one vote in favor of that in Sen.-elect John Fetterman (D-PA). 

MIDTERM ELECTIONS 2022: LIVE UPDATES

The Cortez Masto win slightly diminishes the Senate runoff in Georgia between Sen. Raphael Warnock (right) and GOP challenger Herschel Walker (left). 

The Cortez Masto win slightly diminishes the Senate runoff in Georgia between Sen. Raphael Warnock (right) and GOP challenger Herschel Walker (left). 
(Getty Images)

Moreover, Republicans will likely intensify their internal sniping after failing to pick up the Senate – despite inflation and President Biden’s rotten poll numbers. 

Some Republicans will point fingers at McConnell. McConnell gave himself an out months ago when he began to question the “quality” of Republican candidates this cycle. 

But it was Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) who was in charge of Senate GOP re-election efforts, running the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC). It wasn’t that long ago that Scott was touting the possibility or 53-54 GOP seats. And McConnell was preparing to try to undercut McConnell as Leader. 

In fact, Scott faced criticism earlier this year for his management of the NRSC. There were concerns about how Scott spent NRSC dollars. 

Some Republicans will point fingers at McConnell. McConnell gave himself an out months ago when he began to question the "quality" of Republican candidates this cycle. 

Some Republicans will point fingers at McConnell. McConnell gave himself an out months ago when he began to question the “quality” of Republican candidates this cycle. 
(Bloomberg)

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Some Republicans may not be pleased with McConnell. But they’re not exactly enamored with Scott after this performance. 

Moreover, Congressional Republicans will find themselves having to field questions in the Capitol hallways Wednesday morning about President Trump’s announcement Tuesday night. That exercise is one of the least favorites of Congressional Republicans. Watch Wednesday to see how many stand by the former President – or if others make a clean break and upbraid Mr. Trump for his comments and decision to launch a campaign. 

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hitchhikers-guide-what-tonights-win-cortez-masto-means-the-senate

Politics

Here’s what these Americans think of the Senate’s new dress code: ‘Sway from tradition’

Americans are split in their opinions on the Senate’s new dress code allowing for casual wear by senators.

Fox News Digital asked several Americans in northern Virginia — a short way from Washington, D.C. — about their thoughts on the upper chamber relaxing the longstanding precedent for suits, ties or similarly formal attire this week after Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., dropped the dress code.

The change in the dress code came as a surprise and has been dubbed the “Fetterman rule” due to Democrat Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman’s penchant for casual wear in the Capitol.

FETTERMAN BLASTED BY CONSERVATIVES AFTER SENATE DROPS DRESS CODE: ‘STOP LOWERING THE BAR!’

Democrat Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman

The change in the dress code came as a surprise and has been dubbed the “Fetterman rule” due to Democrat Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman’s penchant for casual wear in the Capitol. (Screenshot/NBC)

Americans were split on the issue, with some decrying the rules as a breakdown of decorum, and another saying casual garb is “not only more friendly to people, but also to the environment.”

“I prefer traditional wear,” one person said. “I think that should be a standard.”

“Maybe a Friday you can take a bit of a lax stance, maybe a hot summer, but I would not sway from tradition,” she continued.

“And I think it conveys a sense of confidence, and that is something that is not to be taken for granted,” she added.

US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer walks through the halls of Congress

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., relaxed the Senate’s dress code this week to allow for casual wear. (MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)

Another person said he thinks the dress code change is “cool,” even though he’s not very into politics.

One respondent said he thinks the change is “a good thing” for the cases when senators need to act fast on a quick vote.

“But in terms of actual Senate decorum and actually the work there, I think it’d be better if they wore a full suit or a full dress,” he added.

Conversely, another person said he thinks the change is “wonderful.”

Democratic West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin and wife Gayle Manchin

West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat, introduced a Senate resolution to restore the dress code. (ALEX EDELMAN/AFP via Getty Images)

“It’s a lot more comfortable for the senators to not have to wake up in the morning and think about what tie to put on or what suit to wear,”

“It saves them time so they can help the community more and serve us,” he added.

The new dress code change has ruffled some feathers on both sides of the aisle in the Senate after Schumer made the change.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., is preparing to issue a bipartisan resolution next week that would re-institute the Senate’s dress code, after Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., relaxed the rules last weekend.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The resolution would revert the dress code back to requiring senators to don coats, ties or business attire while on the Senate floor.

“Next week, Senator Manchin intends to file a bipartisan resolution to ensure the Senate dress code remains consistent with previous expectations,” a spokesperson for Manchin’s office told Fox News Digital in a statement Friday.

Fox News Digital’s Jamie Joseph contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Swatting’ gets a terrifying new update as criminals now wreaking ‘emotional havoc’ as a paid service

Artificial intelligence advancements have helped drive an increase in swatting calls, forcing police to dash to scenes prepared for the worst and endangering Americans’ emotional health or even their lives, a 22-year FBI veteran told Fox News.

“They’re doing it to create chaos,” said James Turgal, vice president of the information security company Optiv. “They’re utilizing this technology, which emboldens them because it’s so much harder for law enforcement to track that back.” 

AI COMPONENT ON SWATTING IS ‘FRIGHTENING’: FORMER COP

WATCH MORE FOX NEWS DIGITAL ORIGINALS HERE

Swatting — when someone makes a false 911 report to illicit a large and aggressive police response — has become increasingly common over the last decade as it becomes easier for callers to mask their voices, phone numbers and IP addresses to remain anonymous. A nationwide database the FBI created this year because of the rise recorded over 200 occurrences since May 1, according to the FBI. 

“The FBI takes swatting very seriously because it puts innocent people at risk,” a FBI spokeperson told Fox News on Thursday. “We will continue to work with our local, state, and federal law enforcement partners to gather, share, and act upon threat information as it comes to our attention.”

Before the database’s inception, swatting calls were not officially tracked. But a former FBI agent, Kevin Kolbye, estimated incidents jumped from 400 in 2011 to over 1,000 in 2019, according to a Anti-Defamation League report.

Armed law enforcement officers

Swatting calls are false 911 reports that are made in an attempt to trigger a powerful police response. Growing concerns about swatting led the FBI to start a national database for tracking the incidents.  (iStock)

SEATTLE MAN ARRESTED FOR OVER 20 ‘SWATTING’ CALLS IN US, CANADA

“They’re utilizing different virtual private networks, they’re bouncing off of IP addresses from different places trying to anonymize themselves, and it’s really the ability to wreak as much emotional havoc as possible,” Turgal said. “There’s a number of different motivations for it, and none of them are good.”

Turgal said swatters want to create emotional distress and put Americans in harm’s way. He estimated that swatting incidents have at least doubled in the last year. 

“There are some threat actors out there that actually do this as a service, as sick as that sounds,” Turgal said. “They actually put themselves out on the dark web and think, ‘well, we’ll dox, or we’ll SWAT any type of organization that you want us to. You pay us a fee, and we’ll do it.'”

He also said overseas terrorists could use AI masking technology to make swatting calls.

Cybercrime and security expert

James Turgal, a 22-year FBI veteran and the vice president of a information security company, says swatting could allow threat actors from overseas to cause harm on Americans. He says advanced technology has made swatting incidents occur at a higher scale.  (Fox News Digital )

“There’s a lot of countries out there now, not to be named, that would like to see the U.S. in chaos,” Turgal added. “They would like to create help to create that situation.” 

Schools have also become targets for fake threats. Nearly 64% of all violent incidents for the 2022-2023 school year were false active shooter reports, according to the Educator’s School Safety Network

“Threat actors out there are utilizing this technique to really cause a lot of harm and a lot of damage to a lot of local schools,” Turgal said. “It’s not just the law enforcement officers that are there rolling into this situation that they don’t know what it is. It’s the students. It’s the faculty. It’s the parents.”

Shooting threat at a U.S. school

School shootings have been on the rise in the U.S., but now some criminals are putting in fake shooting hoaxes at schools to cause emotional distress.  (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey, File)

“There is a tremendous mental and emotional impact that occurs with these cases, and that’s why they’re so difficult,” he continued. 

On March 30, for example, 36 false reports of mass shootings affected nearly 230 New York Schools, ABC News reported

Some swatting calls have even turned deadly. A police officer, for example, shot and killed a Kansas man during a response to a hoax call in 2017. 

FLORIDA SCHOOLS SEE SEVERAL ‘HOAX’ SWATTING CALLS, FORCING MULTIPLE LOCKDOWNS

Thor Eells, executive director of the National Tactical Officers Association, trains around 12,000 law enforcement officers annually. He said his group has to consider the added concerns from advanced AI when it teaches about swatting. 

Former police officer

Thor Eells, executive director of the National Tactical Officers Association, says they have done more training for law enforcement in recent years about swatting. He says artificial intelligence’s ability to make voices sound more credible is concerning.  (Fox News Digital)

“The authenticity component of the AI is frightening,” Eells told Fox News. “It’s really incumbent upon us now to be more proactive than ever in recognizing that these technologies can be used in a negative manner as well as a positive manner.”

AI STEPPING IN TO ASSIST 911 OPERATORS BATTERED BY TRAGIC CALLS, UNDERSTAFFING

One of the concerns police officers face when handling a false threat is the possibility that the hoax was staged so someone could distract law enforcement as they commit a crime elsewhere, Eells said. 

Police and law enforcement on scene

Eells raises concerns about criminals drawing cops attention away from where they aim to commit a crime by calling in a false threat elsewhere.  (Credit: Fox 29)

“When you do draw limited resources away from an area and then have an incident of legitimate criminal purpose take place, it’s a delayed response,” Eells said. “That could have an impact on the outcome.”  

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Eells stressed communication between police, schools and the community as the key factor in curbing cyber crime threats.

“It is very, very important for law enforcement … from their 911 communications centers to their first responders, to their supervisors, to be proactive,” Eells said. They should be “educating, gaining knowledge, and putting steps and procedures into place to mitigate and to minimize the dangers involved with this.” 

Ramiro Vargas contributed to the accompanying video.

Continue Reading

Politics

Mark Levin: The Democratic Party has ‘devoured the culture,’ forcing failed Marxist ideology on free people

Mark Levin’s new book “The Democrat Party Hates America” is aptly named because the leftist party has “devoured the culture” and is set on foisting Marxism on a country founded on personal liberty, the “Life, Liberty & Levin” host said.

Levin was interviewed on his own program by “FOX & Friends Weekend” co-host Pete Hegseth, who praised his colleague’s newest work, which was released Sept. 19.

Hegseth remarked that Americans might think they know the Democratic Party, but that Levin’s book depicts why they might not fully comprehend its history and platform.

Levin has long spoken of the Democratic Party as the preeminent political force in the Confederacy during the Civil War, and that it was the party of former President Woodrow Wilson, who infamously showcased a Ku Klux Klan-friendly film at the White House. 

During the interview, Levin detailed why he believed Wilson to be a “closet racist.”

LEVIN TALKS RISE OF ‘AMERICAN MARXISM’

Mark Levins Book

Mark Levin’s book “The Democrat Party Hates America” was released Sept. 19.  (Simon & Schuster)

“I decided on the title when I finished the book, same with [my previous book] ‘American Marxism,’ and that title describes what’s going on in this country today,” Levin said.

“Marxism is obviously an alien ideology. It is a dangerous ideology. It’s responsible for the death of 100 million people. Why? Because it’s a failed ideology. The ideology is inhumane. It tries to take the human character and rejigger it and re-engineer it and build an entire ideology and society around this rejiggered, this re-engineered individual.”

LEVIN: ATTEMPTS TO CONSTITUTIONALLY BAN TRUMP FROM OFFICE ‘ALREADY FAILED’

Levin said a major flaw in Marxism’s quest to “rejigger” individuality is that only God can create or intrinsically change man, man cannot change his fellow man.

“We can create an environment where we can have law and order, where we can have a civil society, where people can flourish if we emphasize liberty and an economic system that works with liberty, capitalism, if we recognize sovereignty and a culture and assimilation into that culture.”

He said America has long embraced that thought, to its great benefit, adding that now forces within the Democratic Party want to “destroy it.”

“We’re now living in a society where nobody talks about liberty — where they trash our history, they rewrite our history that the Democrat Party has essentially devoured the culture,” he added.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Later in the interview, Levin said the Democratic Party “defended slavery” in the 19th Century and was the party of the Confederacy under Jefferson Davis.

“That was the party opposed to reconstruction,” he said. “That is the party that pushed segregation for 100 years after the Civil War. It is the party of eugenics. It is the party of racism, segregation. It is the party that really segregated the military after the Republicans desegregated it.”

Levin later described how, in the book, he wrote that Democrats are far different than Republicans, calling the GOP an “ineffective” party that is the “default” for Americans who don’t approve of Democratic “radicalism.”

For more Culture, Media, Education, Opinion, and channel coverage, visit foxnews.com/media

Continue Reading

Trending