Connect with us

Politics

Biden administration’s border woes increasing, as 2022 draws to a close

Source image: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admins-border-woes-increasing-2022-draws-close

After a 2022 that saw record numbers of migrants hit the southern border, the Biden administration’s ongoing border and immigration challenges are only increasing – as it stares down a looming end to its ability to expel migrants under Title 42, and an incoming Republican Congress demanding answers.

A federal judge ruled earlier this month that the U.S. government’s use of the Title 42 public health authority to expel a majority of migrants at the southern border is unlawful. While the judge reluctantly allowed a five-week delay requested by the administration, it means the key authority will be scrapped on Dec. 21.

The administration sought to end the order earlier this year, but was blocked by a federal judge and also faced a significant bipartisan backlash given the ongoing border crisis that has only increased in 2022 over 2021’s already historic numbers. In recent months, the administration had in fact expanded Title 42, with cooperation with Mexico, to include Venezuelan nationals after a surge in migrants from the country.

There were more than 2.3 million migrant encounters in FY 2022, over the 1.7 million encountered in FY 2021. FY 23 has shown few signs of slowing down with more than 230,000 encounters in October alone. 

REPUBLICANS, AHEAD OF HOUSE TAKEOVER, LOOK TO ZERO IN ON BIDEN ADMIN’S HANDLING OF BORDER CRISIS

The Biden administration has said repeatedly that it has a plan in place for the end of Title 42, noting additionally that the order’s end will allow it to increase penalties for illegal entry and has plans to increase alternative forms of deportation such as expedited removal — which allows for deportation without a hearing.

An under-fire DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas earlier this month defended the administration’s position, saying it intends to use the same plan it had in April.

That plan includes surging personnel and technology to the border, prioritizing “smart border security solutions,” ramping up anti-cartel efforts, bolstering non-profits and making the processing of migrants into the U.S. more efficient.

Additionally, Mayorkas said the administration will focus on increasing consequences for illegal entry. 

“We are enhancing the consequences for unlawful entry, especially with respect to individuals who seek to evade law enforcement, including removal, detention and criminal prosecution when warranted,” he said at a congressional hearing.

Mayorkas has also sought to highlight that the U.S. migrant crisis is actually one being experienced by the entire Hemisphere.

“The entire hemisphere is suffering a migration crisis. We are seeing an unprecedented movement of people from country to country. It is not restricted to the southern border,” he said.

But it has so far failed to assuage the administration’s critics — with even some Democrats remaining nervy about the looming end to the Trump-era order. Democratic Sens. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and Jon Tester, D-Mont., wrote to Mayorkas this week expressing “deep concern” about the end of Title 42.

They note that DHS has conceded that an end to Title 42 will lead to an increase in the number of migrants encountered along the southern border, and noted previous concerns about DHS preparations.

“Record annual encounters have led to untenable situations. In Arizona, shelters have been forced well beyond capacity. This month, El Paso has seen over 700 migrants released directly onto city streets due to overcrowding,” they say. “This is not safe, and creates a dangerous situation for migrants and communities.”

Border Patrol agents have also been worried about the end of the order, with the National Border Patrol Council predicting a “s—show” if the order expires.

Republicans to take control in the House

Republicans have also been hammering the administration over the expiration of the order — and the GOP’s voice is about to get a lot louder as its House caucus will take control of the chamber early next year, opening a new front in their efforts to put pressure on the administration over the crisis.

GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy previewed the aggressive stance when, during a trip to the border last week, he demanded Mayorkas resign or face possible impeachment hearings when Republicans take the House.

DHS PUSHES BACK AGAINST MCCARTHY CALL FOR MAYORKAS TO RESIGN OR FACE POTENTIAL IMPEACHMENT 

“He cannot and must not remain in that position,” McCarthy said. “If Secretary Mayorkas does not resign, House Republicans will investigate every order, every action and every failure to determine whether we can begin an impeachment inquiry.”

McCarthy said he had spoken to Reps. Jim Jordan and James Comer, the ranking Republicans of the Judiciary and Oversight Committees, respectively, and said they have his complete support to investigate the “collapse” of the border.

“The American public deserves more, deserves better and expects more within their government. Enough is enough. We will do whatever it takes,” he said.

DHS quickly pushed back, accusing lawmakers of blaming the agency for the failures of Congress to fix immigration law.

“Members of Congress can do better than point the finger at someone else; they should come to the table and work on solutions for our broken system and outdated laws, which have not been overhauled in over 40 years,” a DHS spokesperson said on Wednesday.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas testifies before a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on "Worldwide Threats to the Homeland" on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 15, 2022. 

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas testifies before a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on “Worldwide Threats to the Homeland” on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 15, 2022. 
(REUTERS/Michael A. McCoy)

ICE rules frozen

Meanwhile, the Biden administration is engaged in another legal wrangle, now before the Supreme Court, over its efforts to dramatically narrow Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrest and deportation priorities.

In 2021 the administration issued a memo that restricted ICE agents to prioritizing three sets of illegal immigrants — recent border crossers, “aggravated felons” and national security threats. The restricted priorities coincided with a sharp drop in arrests and deportations, but the administration claimed it was quality rather than quality — and Mayorkas declared that it had “fundamentally changed immigration enforcement in the interior.” 

“For the first time ever, our policy explicitly states that a non-citizen’s unlawful presence in the United States will not, by itself, be a basis for the initiation of an enforcement action,” he said.

That led to a legal challenge from Republican states, who said the policy was damaging to their states and against congressional law which mandates DHS detains most illegal immigrants. The guidelines have since been frozen, casting uncertainty over how ICE should conduct its mission.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The appeal to that ruling went before the high court for oral arguments on Tuesday, and a majority of the Court appeared likely to limit the government’s discretion in the matter. 

Chief Justice John Roberts noted federal immigration law mandates DHS “shall” detain and remove most non-citizens in the country illegally.

“It’s our job to say what the law is, not whether or not it can be possibly implemented or whether there are difficulties there,” said Roberts.

The high court in this case was dealing with three issues: whether the state plaintiffs have “standing” in court to challenge the DHS enforcement policies, whether those guidelines are contrary to federal law, or otherwise violate the Administrative Procedure Act; and whether federal law prevents the entry of an order to “hold unlawful and set aside” the Guidelines under federal law. A ruling is expected in June 2023. 

Fox News’ William Mears contributed to this report.

 

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admins-border-woes-increasing-2022-draws-close

Politics

Here’s what these Americans think of the Senate’s new dress code: ‘Sway from tradition’

Americans are split in their opinions on the Senate’s new dress code allowing for casual wear by senators.

Fox News Digital asked several Americans in northern Virginia — a short way from Washington, D.C. — about their thoughts on the upper chamber relaxing the longstanding precedent for suits, ties or similarly formal attire this week after Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., dropped the dress code.

The change in the dress code came as a surprise and has been dubbed the “Fetterman rule” due to Democrat Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman’s penchant for casual wear in the Capitol.

FETTERMAN BLASTED BY CONSERVATIVES AFTER SENATE DROPS DRESS CODE: ‘STOP LOWERING THE BAR!’

Democrat Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman

The change in the dress code came as a surprise and has been dubbed the “Fetterman rule” due to Democrat Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman’s penchant for casual wear in the Capitol. (Screenshot/NBC)

Americans were split on the issue, with some decrying the rules as a breakdown of decorum, and another saying casual garb is “not only more friendly to people, but also to the environment.”

“I prefer traditional wear,” one person said. “I think that should be a standard.”

“Maybe a Friday you can take a bit of a lax stance, maybe a hot summer, but I would not sway from tradition,” she continued.

“And I think it conveys a sense of confidence, and that is something that is not to be taken for granted,” she added.

US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer walks through the halls of Congress

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., relaxed the Senate’s dress code this week to allow for casual wear. (MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)

Another person said he thinks the dress code change is “cool,” even though he’s not very into politics.

One respondent said he thinks the change is “a good thing” for the cases when senators need to act fast on a quick vote.

“But in terms of actual Senate decorum and actually the work there, I think it’d be better if they wore a full suit or a full dress,” he added.

Conversely, another person said he thinks the change is “wonderful.”

Democratic West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin and wife Gayle Manchin

West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat, introduced a Senate resolution to restore the dress code. (ALEX EDELMAN/AFP via Getty Images)

“It’s a lot more comfortable for the senators to not have to wake up in the morning and think about what tie to put on or what suit to wear,”

“It saves them time so they can help the community more and serve us,” he added.

The new dress code change has ruffled some feathers on both sides of the aisle in the Senate after Schumer made the change.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., is preparing to issue a bipartisan resolution next week that would re-institute the Senate’s dress code, after Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., relaxed the rules last weekend.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The resolution would revert the dress code back to requiring senators to don coats, ties or business attire while on the Senate floor.

“Next week, Senator Manchin intends to file a bipartisan resolution to ensure the Senate dress code remains consistent with previous expectations,” a spokesperson for Manchin’s office told Fox News Digital in a statement Friday.

Fox News Digital’s Jamie Joseph contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Swatting’ gets a terrifying new update as criminals now wreaking ‘emotional havoc’ as a paid service

Artificial intelligence advancements have helped drive an increase in swatting calls, forcing police to dash to scenes prepared for the worst and endangering Americans’ emotional health or even their lives, a 22-year FBI veteran told Fox News.

“They’re doing it to create chaos,” said James Turgal, vice president of the information security company Optiv. “They’re utilizing this technology, which emboldens them because it’s so much harder for law enforcement to track that back.” 

AI COMPONENT ON SWATTING IS ‘FRIGHTENING’: FORMER COP

WATCH MORE FOX NEWS DIGITAL ORIGINALS HERE

Swatting — when someone makes a false 911 report to illicit a large and aggressive police response — has become increasingly common over the last decade as it becomes easier for callers to mask their voices, phone numbers and IP addresses to remain anonymous. A nationwide database the FBI created this year because of the rise recorded over 200 occurrences since May 1, according to the FBI. 

“The FBI takes swatting very seriously because it puts innocent people at risk,” a FBI spokeperson told Fox News on Thursday. “We will continue to work with our local, state, and federal law enforcement partners to gather, share, and act upon threat information as it comes to our attention.”

Before the database’s inception, swatting calls were not officially tracked. But a former FBI agent, Kevin Kolbye, estimated incidents jumped from 400 in 2011 to over 1,000 in 2019, according to a Anti-Defamation League report.

Armed law enforcement officers

Swatting calls are false 911 reports that are made in an attempt to trigger a powerful police response. Growing concerns about swatting led the FBI to start a national database for tracking the incidents.  (iStock)

SEATTLE MAN ARRESTED FOR OVER 20 ‘SWATTING’ CALLS IN US, CANADA

“They’re utilizing different virtual private networks, they’re bouncing off of IP addresses from different places trying to anonymize themselves, and it’s really the ability to wreak as much emotional havoc as possible,” Turgal said. “There’s a number of different motivations for it, and none of them are good.”

Turgal said swatters want to create emotional distress and put Americans in harm’s way. He estimated that swatting incidents have at least doubled in the last year. 

“There are some threat actors out there that actually do this as a service, as sick as that sounds,” Turgal said. “They actually put themselves out on the dark web and think, ‘well, we’ll dox, or we’ll SWAT any type of organization that you want us to. You pay us a fee, and we’ll do it.'”

He also said overseas terrorists could use AI masking technology to make swatting calls.

Cybercrime and security expert

James Turgal, a 22-year FBI veteran and the vice president of a information security company, says swatting could allow threat actors from overseas to cause harm on Americans. He says advanced technology has made swatting incidents occur at a higher scale.  (Fox News Digital )

“There’s a lot of countries out there now, not to be named, that would like to see the U.S. in chaos,” Turgal added. “They would like to create help to create that situation.” 

Schools have also become targets for fake threats. Nearly 64% of all violent incidents for the 2022-2023 school year were false active shooter reports, according to the Educator’s School Safety Network

“Threat actors out there are utilizing this technique to really cause a lot of harm and a lot of damage to a lot of local schools,” Turgal said. “It’s not just the law enforcement officers that are there rolling into this situation that they don’t know what it is. It’s the students. It’s the faculty. It’s the parents.”

Shooting threat at a U.S. school

School shootings have been on the rise in the U.S., but now some criminals are putting in fake shooting hoaxes at schools to cause emotional distress.  (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey, File)

“There is a tremendous mental and emotional impact that occurs with these cases, and that’s why they’re so difficult,” he continued. 

On March 30, for example, 36 false reports of mass shootings affected nearly 230 New York Schools, ABC News reported

Some swatting calls have even turned deadly. A police officer, for example, shot and killed a Kansas man during a response to a hoax call in 2017. 

FLORIDA SCHOOLS SEE SEVERAL ‘HOAX’ SWATTING CALLS, FORCING MULTIPLE LOCKDOWNS

Thor Eells, executive director of the National Tactical Officers Association, trains around 12,000 law enforcement officers annually. He said his group has to consider the added concerns from advanced AI when it teaches about swatting. 

Former police officer

Thor Eells, executive director of the National Tactical Officers Association, says they have done more training for law enforcement in recent years about swatting. He says artificial intelligence’s ability to make voices sound more credible is concerning.  (Fox News Digital)

“The authenticity component of the AI is frightening,” Eells told Fox News. “It’s really incumbent upon us now to be more proactive than ever in recognizing that these technologies can be used in a negative manner as well as a positive manner.”

AI STEPPING IN TO ASSIST 911 OPERATORS BATTERED BY TRAGIC CALLS, UNDERSTAFFING

One of the concerns police officers face when handling a false threat is the possibility that the hoax was staged so someone could distract law enforcement as they commit a crime elsewhere, Eells said. 

Police and law enforcement on scene

Eells raises concerns about criminals drawing cops attention away from where they aim to commit a crime by calling in a false threat elsewhere.  (Credit: Fox 29)

“When you do draw limited resources away from an area and then have an incident of legitimate criminal purpose take place, it’s a delayed response,” Eells said. “That could have an impact on the outcome.”  

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Eells stressed communication between police, schools and the community as the key factor in curbing cyber crime threats.

“It is very, very important for law enforcement … from their 911 communications centers to their first responders, to their supervisors, to be proactive,” Eells said. They should be “educating, gaining knowledge, and putting steps and procedures into place to mitigate and to minimize the dangers involved with this.” 

Ramiro Vargas contributed to the accompanying video.

Continue Reading

Politics

Mark Levin: The Democratic Party has ‘devoured the culture,’ forcing failed Marxist ideology on free people

Mark Levin’s new book “The Democrat Party Hates America” is aptly named because the leftist party has “devoured the culture” and is set on foisting Marxism on a country founded on personal liberty, the “Life, Liberty & Levin” host said.

Levin was interviewed on his own program by “FOX & Friends Weekend” co-host Pete Hegseth, who praised his colleague’s newest work, which was released Sept. 19.

Hegseth remarked that Americans might think they know the Democratic Party, but that Levin’s book depicts why they might not fully comprehend its history and platform.

Levin has long spoken of the Democratic Party as the preeminent political force in the Confederacy during the Civil War, and that it was the party of former President Woodrow Wilson, who infamously showcased a Ku Klux Klan-friendly film at the White House. 

During the interview, Levin detailed why he believed Wilson to be a “closet racist.”

LEVIN TALKS RISE OF ‘AMERICAN MARXISM’

Mark Levins Book

Mark Levin’s book “The Democrat Party Hates America” was released Sept. 19.  (Simon & Schuster)

“I decided on the title when I finished the book, same with [my previous book] ‘American Marxism,’ and that title describes what’s going on in this country today,” Levin said.

“Marxism is obviously an alien ideology. It is a dangerous ideology. It’s responsible for the death of 100 million people. Why? Because it’s a failed ideology. The ideology is inhumane. It tries to take the human character and rejigger it and re-engineer it and build an entire ideology and society around this rejiggered, this re-engineered individual.”

LEVIN: ATTEMPTS TO CONSTITUTIONALLY BAN TRUMP FROM OFFICE ‘ALREADY FAILED’

Levin said a major flaw in Marxism’s quest to “rejigger” individuality is that only God can create or intrinsically change man, man cannot change his fellow man.

“We can create an environment where we can have law and order, where we can have a civil society, where people can flourish if we emphasize liberty and an economic system that works with liberty, capitalism, if we recognize sovereignty and a culture and assimilation into that culture.”

He said America has long embraced that thought, to its great benefit, adding that now forces within the Democratic Party want to “destroy it.”

“We’re now living in a society where nobody talks about liberty — where they trash our history, they rewrite our history that the Democrat Party has essentially devoured the culture,” he added.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Later in the interview, Levin said the Democratic Party “defended slavery” in the 19th Century and was the party of the Confederacy under Jefferson Davis.

“That was the party opposed to reconstruction,” he said. “That is the party that pushed segregation for 100 years after the Civil War. It is the party of eugenics. It is the party of racism, segregation. It is the party that really segregated the military after the Republicans desegregated it.”

Levin later described how, in the book, he wrote that Democrats are far different than Republicans, calling the GOP an “ineffective” party that is the “default” for Americans who don’t approve of Democratic “radicalism.”

For more Culture, Media, Education, Opinion, and channel coverage, visit foxnews.com/media

Continue Reading

Trending